If there should be an occurrence of "evidences", we ought to be watchful, as the Atlantis point is a decent path for profiting. Be that as it may, notwithstanding fake confirmations, there are some reliable contentions as well. We should think.
The Piri Reis map originate from about the year 1513.
Columbus, the man who found America as the main individual said in chronicled records, contemplated more seasoned maps including the guide of Admiral Piri Reis, which goes back to 1513. Though the mainland of America was found in 1492, these maps picture the world fit as a fiddle that is against the learning of the present verifiable science. The Piri Reis map pictures additionally Antarctis exactly 300 years before it was found - the forms are very precise.
Not just this makes us "stupid". Teacher Hapgood reached the US Air Force to affirm the hypothesis about the way that the area territories of the Piri Reis map imagining Antarctis are not underneath ice. He got a positive answer.
I might want to accept... However, most feelings relating to this subject are a result of control that helps their creators keep up a "great job" or establishment themselves in some chain of importance of the world. The Italian researcher Diego Cuoghi records some subtle elements - as of now at the season of the Turkish Admiral, South America was being found by more explorers; one of them was Amerigo Vespucci (in 1499); be that as it may, there are likewise maps dated before 1513 and much more exact than the Piri Reis map in the event that we concentrate on Cuba, Jamaica and Porto Rico - these territories are envisioned erroneously on the aforementioned map. Journalists like Dänikin or Professor Hapgood essentially disregard this.
We can likewise say a guide by Juan de la Cosa (1500) or Cantino (1502). On the off chance that we put Antarctis or "unfamiliar" islands into the profile, this can't be seen as verification, in light of the fact that, for instance, Waldseemüller's guide from 1507 pictures China delayed from the back of India - China really going to Sri Lanka... In this manner, we could say that the missing some portion of Brazil on the Piri outline did not exist!
What's more, shouldn't something be said about exact forms of Antarctis? I surmise that Hapgood, von Dänikan and different essayists presumptuously disparage deduction and knowledge of old individuals and they overlooked that Egyptians were great mariners as well.
This suggests if the Alexandrian library was crushed as the wealthiest wellspring of data we had ever had - any great Egyptian pharaoh - a visionary could undoubtedly bolster a major campaign and it is conceivable that some antiquated mariners realized that Antarctis existed. Having no records about this doesn't as a matter of course imply that old individuals did not investigate America or Antarctis in the old past; neither does it imply that they needed to end up "extraterrestrials", as creative energy of present scholars regularly demonstrates, as they seem to surmise that antiquated individuals were not in any case ready to think.
Discoveries 2016
EmoticonEmoticon