Is there unmistakable logical confirmation or even "verification" for the presence of God?
Daniel the resurrected prophet in the 21st century does not need you to be a visually impaired confidence devotee. Or maybe, take a gander at the confirmation, both individual by the writer and deductively accessible to us in the present day time, where it was guaranteed in the Biblical book of Daniel 2,500 years prior that numerous would "rushed forward and backward, and information expanded." (Daniel 12)
That day has touched base with the appearance of the Internet toward the end of an age with the staggering measure of data included for nothing on a huge number of sites far and wide.
Utilizing the present limited degree meaning of the expression "evidence," there is no exact verification as some inconceivably and unreasonably request. Reality or untruth of this announcement is not based upon confirmation or absence of proof, but rather by definition alone.
While "Clever Design" cynics may assert there is no confirmation of God, the real investigative proof for God's presence is overpowering, deductively noting the inquiry, "does God exist?"
What is it about agnostics that they would invest so much time, consideration and vitality negating something that they don't accept even exists? Numerous nonbelievers are simply intense ex-religious sorts who have gotten to be disappointed by the conduct of "awful acting Christians or Muslims" or point to the outrages and passings credited to composed religions in past hundreds of years, or take a gander at the unsteadiness of antiquated sacred texts along these lines disposing of every one of them, basically "tossing the infant out with the bathwater."
EmoticonEmoticon